PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '19 at 07:43 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
33.3%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 61 65 66 66 64 MB/s
|
23.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB
1GB free
Firmware: 3.ACF
|
||||
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
39GB free
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 51 50 54 53 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.2 MB/s
|
6.36%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 506x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |