HP Compaq 8510p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8510p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C5
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$70
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 58.6
22% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 59.4
8-Core 59.2
8% 59.3 Pts
64-Core 58.8
4% 58.8 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
HP(103C 30C5) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 2.7
2% 6.37 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 9.7
1% 5.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$39
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 14 8.6 12 13 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 232
Write 203
Mixed 200
SusWrite 21.1
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12.9
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 14.6
12% 18 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
465GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 14 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 12.6
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 71%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 32GB
13GB free
Firmware: 01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.9 5.9 6.1 8.6 9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 15
Write 8.2
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 7.6
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
310% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq 8510p Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8510p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback