Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181107
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 162
2-Core 326
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,279
114% 964 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 132
Parallax 151
119% 143 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 135
Splatting 104
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,280
Write 1,299
Mixed 1,162
348% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 86.9
293% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,473
DQ Mixed 1,011
825% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 138 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 137
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 7.1 6 7.1 7.2 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 11
Write 3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.7
8% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
111% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 7.8
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.2
11% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.9 8 7.5 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 7.8
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.7
182% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 27
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 30
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $563
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback