Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 133% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190121
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 17:52
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 96.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 317 95% 178 Pts	4-Core 587 8-Core 1,014 97% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,306 81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 203 Parallax 202 153% 198 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 188 Splatting 132 122% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 259 281 298 296 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,971 Write 1,404 Mixed 618 SusWrite 341 239% 1,084 MB/s	4K Read 49.8 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 52.8 226% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 743 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 319 281% 435 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 236%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 86GB free Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 313 317 317 315 316 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 481 Write 302 Mixed 241 SusWrite 315 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 15.6 124% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 84.9 109% 193 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 84%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 127GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 300 302 301 302 301 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,406 Write 1,461 Mixed 1,017 SusWrite 476 296% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 87 306% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 963 DQ Write 1366 DQ Mixed 988 796% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 280%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 731GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 108 112 107 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 56.7 Write 170 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 109 66% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 2.2 383% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 81GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 113 119 121 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 47.8 Write 84.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 118 49% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 128 145 137 136 133 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 101 Write 120 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 131 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.6 183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 506GB free, PID 3312 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 124 116 119 119 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 49.2 Write 89.2 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 118 124% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.6 266% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB 6,011 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 29.2 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 28.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 50.9 79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,882x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	210x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	754x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	359x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	295x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16