Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V16.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V16.1
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 22:53
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 655
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 6.25
5% 27.9 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 11.8
7% 7.94 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 550 672 578 572 397 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 584
Write 643
Mixed 572
SusWrite 564
134% 591 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 46.3
163% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 288
244% 353 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 125%
Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
183GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 120 120 118 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 64.8
Write 112
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 116
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52%
Great: 95%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
30GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 37
Write 36.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 41.8
51% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V16.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback