Asrock A88M-G/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A88M-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '19 at 01:15
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 114 49% 81.1 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 192 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% PowerColor(148C 2015) ≥ 4GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 30.7 21% 28 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 32.8 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 90 90 89 89 92 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 192 Write 118 Mixed 159 SusWrite 87.8 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 25.8 100% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 104 80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 190 191 191 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 188 Mixed 38 SusWrite 191 109% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 3,641 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 15.2 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 10.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	18x
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples	13x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	6x
T253X2001T 1TBTeamBench 75%, 11,283 samples	4x
WT200-128GB 128GBBench 59%, 21 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI M378B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 16GBSamsungBench 41%, 22 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	4x
F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL F3-2133C10-4GSR F3-2133C9-4GXL 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 9 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16