Asus Rampage III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-950-$299
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.3% Above average
1-Core 90
2-Core 180
63% 135 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 452
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 455
30% 455 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70% Very good
Lighting 267
Reflection 242
Parallax 279
70% 263 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 265
Splatting 176
71% 220 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ocz-soli D3 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 64 53 63 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 103
Write 76
Mixed 119
SusWrite 60.6
20% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 95.6
76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 56%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
118GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 62.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 60
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
44GB free
Firmware: P22OA70A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 59.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 50.6
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 40%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
486GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 92
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 91.3
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Rampage III Formula Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $671
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback