Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 19:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 135
60% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 418
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 51.5
Parallax 61.2
38% 53 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37
35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 90 81 96 96 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 256
Write 124
Mixed 180
SusWrite 90.8
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 34.9
124% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 84.3
69% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
32GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 188 107 105 104 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 475
Write 234
Mixed 340
SusWrite 164
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 36
136% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 177
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
203GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 188 190 190 189 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 114
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 188
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
561GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 59
SusWrite 74.5
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 70%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
28GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 17 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 12
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 16.2
20% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.9
129% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 556c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.2 5.7 6.3 5.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 5.4
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.4
114% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G160081 ST51264BA160B.16FM PSD34G160081 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback