Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 900 3,169 User benchmarks, average bench 30% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 32.7 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 17.9 16% 21.8 Pts	4-Core 23 8-Core 25.9 3% 24.5 Pts	64-Core 26 2% 26 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0459) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.37 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.38 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 133 99 84 26 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 199 Write 214 Mixed 187 SusWrite 111 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 15.4 50% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 57.4 DQ Write 38.5 DQ Mixed 31.8 28% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 4096, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.35% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.7 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples	3x
Celeron Dual Core T3300IntelBench 35%, 619 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	3x
BNA DriverRoyalBench 0%, 78 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16