Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Intel SandyBridge Platform
Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 13:58
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 495 48% 395 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AR10001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 95.8 Write 64.3 Mixed 56.1 54% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 2x4GB 1,911 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16