Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '19 at 09:16
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 95.2 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 461 62% 465 Pts	64-Core 461 29% 461 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435 6,727 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AMD(1002 3000) 3GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 70.3 45% 54.4 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 54.6 Splatting 46.1 37% 45.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MZ7KM960HMJP0D3 960GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: GD53 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 459 456 469 470 466 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 462 Mixed 385 SusWrite 452 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 39.7 129% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 188 158% 222 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 114%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 58GB free Firmware: FL2H SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 150 153 153 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 150 Write 140 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 152 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 126GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 98 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 97.2 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.9% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 19.9 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 20.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 56.6 71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	22x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	17x

SSD
MZ7KM960HMJP0D3 960GBBench 99%, 133 samples	27x
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	11x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 029E CM3X2G1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CM3X2G1600C8 8GBUnknownBench 60%, 17 samples	17x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	4x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $324

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16