| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090625 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 09 '19 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.5%
Average
|
38% 58.6 Pts
|
19% 146 Pts
|
10% 165 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Asus(1043 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
46% 38 fps
|
47% 58.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 86 79 87 83 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
27% 119 MB/s
|
87% 30.2 MB/s
|
30% 44.9 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
28GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 57 58 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
35% 47.6 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
11% 3.97 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
| Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |