Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 120 59% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 392 36% 302 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 50.5 Parallax 54.2 38% 50.3 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 38.4 35% 43 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 227 202 196 192 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 339 Write 292 Mixed 265 SusWrite 210 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 34.3 114% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 232 177% 241 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 124%
Maxtor STM3320620A 320GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 281GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 68 67 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 60.4 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 67.5 43% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 43%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 197GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 56 57 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 80.4 Write 77.4 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 55.8 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAB F3-1600C9-4GAB 8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	40x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	7x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	4x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $46Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
VERTEX3 60GBOCZBench 60%, 3,574 samples	2x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16