Intel NUC6i7KYB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R)
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180911
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 21:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 542
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 16.3
14% 15 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 25.7
17% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VG 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 257 262 263 264 267 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 14
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC6i7KYB Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC6i7KYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback