PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Packard imedia S3210 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Packard WMCP78M |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 2 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 8 |
BIOS Date | 20091106 |
Uptime | 10.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '19 at 17:28 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon LE-1660
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0153) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 311.6
|
0.46%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 60 69 73 62 67 MB/s
|
21%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X2 215AMD $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples | 9x |
Athlon II X2 240AMDBench 40%, 5,506 samples | 1x |
Athlon II X3 425AMDBench 42%, 1,367 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples | 3x |
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples | 3x |
GeForce 8200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,005 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $29 |