Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 402
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 92.6
62% 79.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 57.2
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 925 662 217 197 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 642
Mixed 653
SusWrite 497
171% 773 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 43.5
158% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 454
334% 435 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 150%
Great: 241%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
91GB free
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 357 199 175 142 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 493
Write 419
Mixed 395
SusWrite 201
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 38.3
126% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 259
205% 283 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
34GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 97.8
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 112%
WD WD2500LPVX-00V0TT0 250GB
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 65 67 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 99.7
Write 94
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 65.8
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
42GB free, PID dd33
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 0.2 2.6 10 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 91.5
Write 12.3
Mixed 25
SusWrite 8.1
33% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
143% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback