| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 14 '19 at 05:04 |
| Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.6%
Good
|
55% 87.2 Pts
|
32% 262 Pts
|
22% 359 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
|
35.1%
Below average
|
37% 39.6 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 377 399 408 413 404 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
90% 399 MB/s
|
138% 45.9 MB/s
|
59% 124 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.6%
Average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
55% 72.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 112x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $269 |