| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MONSTER TULPAR T5 V12.1 |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161201 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 15 '19 at 13:42 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
| CPU Throttled | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.9%
Good
|
62% 104 Pts
|
44% 353 Pts
|
25% 398 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60%
Good
|
59% 79.5 fps
|
62% 74 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 273 150 125 86 86 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
85% 376 MB/s
|
118% 46.5 MB/s
|
256% 356 MB/s
|
|
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
584GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 110 110 109 MB/s
|
64.7%
Good
|
64% 88.5 MB/s
|
129% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
44.9%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
54% 73.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TULPAR T5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 14x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 2x |
| Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $369 |