Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '19 at 18:31
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 183 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 261 30% 231 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 56.5 Parallax 54.2 32% 50.2 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 48.4 40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 24 117 38 18 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 158 Write 163 Mixed 177 SusWrite 46.8 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 59%
Hitachi HCP725032GLA380 320GB 1,273 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 213GB free Firmware: GM3OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 59 58 59 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 60.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 57.7 35% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GB 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.9 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,112x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	638x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	554x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	838x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	468x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	366x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	312x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	162x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	155x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	112x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16