Asus Z97-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 06:19
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 244
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 648
67% 537 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 155
Parallax 128
109% 139 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 127
Splatting 111
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
166GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 244 246 251 244 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 343
Write 332
Mixed 308
SusWrite 244
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 42
132% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 208
155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 134%
SABRENT 1TB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 601 600 600 600 596 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 137 136 139 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 137
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
100GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 52 54 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 52.4
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 53.2
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 57%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
55GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 53.8
Mixed 42
SusWrite 40.4
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 51%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 51
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 55.4
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
497GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 111 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 25.9
Write 118
Mixed 32
SusWrite 101
50% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2.2
392% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 21.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-DELUXE Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE - $650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,328
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback