Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 694
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.5
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 306 307 308 306 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 472
Mixed 426
SusWrite 325
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 52.6
176% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
224GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 63.4
Write 93.6
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 123
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
173GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 75.5
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 132
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.2 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 4.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 2.6
10% 9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 25.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback