MSI MS-16JF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GV62 8RD
Motherboard	MSI MS-16JF (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	30%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 112 2-Core 200 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 530 55% 443 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 1221) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6912 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 5.12 3% 12.7 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 5.48 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB 3,089 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT2200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 153 105 128 110 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 351 Write 386 Mixed 327 SusWrite 131 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 37.4 112% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 300 224% 297 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 109%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 511GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 97 97 96 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 126 Write 108 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 97.4 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 0.7 253% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.2% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.9 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16JF Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JF

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	372x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	216x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	349x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	136x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	103x

SSD
RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,961 samples	56x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	22x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	18x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	128x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	59x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16