| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151102 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 19 '19 at 07:32 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.1%
Good
|
74% 128 Pts
|
36% 271 Pts
|
24% 382 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
29% 32.3 fps
|
29% 35.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
336% 1,614 MB/s
|
1,399% 309 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
62.9%
Good
|
64% 22.5 GB/s
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
51% 77.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B150M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 868 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 124x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 117x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $283 |