Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 11:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 98.1
50% 77 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 192
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 5.66
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 5.87
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 228 240 246 239 240 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 391
Write 340
Mixed 300
SusWrite 239
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 24.1
95% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 178
154% 227 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
883GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 110 108 110 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 108
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
613GB free
Firmware: 1AA01108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 75 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 72
Write 78.1
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 75.6
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4 4 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 13.8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 4.2
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
124% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback