Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 520
58% 453 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 21.7
14% 18.6 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 258
Write 346
Mixed 267
SusWrite 71.9
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 39.2
125% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 54.5
48% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
318GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 71
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 73.3
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
43GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 37.6
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback