Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 180 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 420 44% 354 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2103) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.48% Terrible	Lighting 8.87 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 9.22 7% 8.72 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.04 2% 3.01 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.48% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 58 61 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 22.3 Write 70.9 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 61 31% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KSH-8G 2x8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	375x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	206x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	111x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 3,305 samples	99x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	56x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $500

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16