PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141106 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '19 at 02:54 |
Run Duration | 260 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 140 109 110 111 94 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
50.9%
Above average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
447GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 121 128 128 121 MB/s
|
75.2%
Very good
|
|||
49.6%
Average
|
||||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 106 119 120 112 MB/s
|
69.9%
Good
|
|||
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 106 111 110 105 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 6.4 5.7 5.7 6.1 6 MB/s
|
7.52%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 143x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 28x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $490 |