| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 21 '19 at 05:21 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36.8%
Below average
|
41% 61 Pts
|
9% 72.6 Pts
|
5% 77.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
ASRock(1849 9993) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
|
1.86%
Terrible
|
2% 2.57 fps
|
2% 2.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 296 294 300 316 259 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
32% 141 MB/s
|
40% 16.2 MB/s
|
93% 121 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR3 1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.1%
Poor
|
20% 6.83 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples | 62x |
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 48x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 37x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |