Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 08:33
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 680
71% 568 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6578
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 7.5
6% 8.67 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 15
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 130
Parallax 113
91% 118 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 90.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
633GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1808 1744 1505 1472 1419 1388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1927
Write 1,898
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 1,556
372% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.1
184% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,216
909% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 283%
Great: 410%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 184 188 191 185 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 180
Write 191
Mixed 122
SusWrite 188
232% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 26.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback