Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 10:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 662
76% 593 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 114
Parallax 90.7
64% 94.1 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 110
Splatting 94.7
83% 102 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 72 45 79 90 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 306
Write 56
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 80.8
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 11.2
42% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 28.2
DQ Mixed 32.4
24% 32 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 73%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
7GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 32 37 35 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 11.3
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 27.5
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
111GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 128 119 122 114 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 92.7
Write 118
Mixed 73
SusWrite 120
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 27
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback