PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190307 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 10:34 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | NZL-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.3
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 236 233 240 224 223 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
316GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 88 88 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.2 3.2 6 6.9 6.9 MB/s
|
4.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 414x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 214x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 187x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |