Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5775R 158 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 567 59% 476 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6200 (Desktop) 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 13.7 9% 12.4 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 18.7 12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 11%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB 3,936 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 449 Write 364 Mixed 343 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 44.3 143% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 334 251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 694GB free Firmware: 2BE10001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 96.5 Write 21 Mixed 57 44% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.9 199% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,168 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 19.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-5775RIntelBench 80%, 158 samples	7x

GPU
Iris Pro HD 6200 (Desktop)IntelBench 10%, 1,198 samples	7x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	3x
600 240GBSeagate $215Bench 82%, 3,595 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples	2x
CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GBUnknownBench 52%, 320 samples	1x
CT102464BF186D.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 52%, 327 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16