Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 60.8 36% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 41.4 8-Core 72.9 7% 57.2 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF82) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.75 0% 1.74 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3263GSXN 320GB 883 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: GC002M SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 47 44 40 38 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 34.2 Write 63.7 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 41.9 30% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 38%
Generic- Multi-Card 2GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.6 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.6 8% 6.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB 6,000 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.6 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16