Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1824 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '19 at 13:22
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 69.6 1-Core 138 2-Core 277 86% 162 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 835 84% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,358 84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1654 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 116 Parallax 105 93% 112 fps	MRender 96.8 Gravity 105 Splatting 90.4 79% 97.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,982 Write 1,218 Mixed 837 296% 1,346 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 53 222% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,139 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 805 615% 846 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 98GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 443 441 446 441 443 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 446 Mixed 395 SusWrite 441 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 56 185% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 89 81 95 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 75.5 Write 65.2 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 93.6 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.7% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 25.6 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 25.3 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	566x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	524x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	455x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	267x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	193x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	261x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16