Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 155 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 534 52% 425 Pts	64-Core 1,200 74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 68.2 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 55.7 56% 64.7 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 71 58% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB 2,810 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 180 181 179 179 179 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.9% Average	Read 211 Write 181 Mixed 180 SusWrite 180 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 16.7 74% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 25.5 26% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 99%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 931GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 137 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 141 Write 97.5 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 138 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 4.8 4.3 6.6 5.1 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 0.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.7 6% 6.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 66GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.9 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	251x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16