Asus X51RL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus X51RL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X51RL
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T2330-$90
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 31.8
30% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 34.1
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 35.8
2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 1100
Asus(1043 1402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.400.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.35
0% 0.22 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 119 130 127 131 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.7% Below average
Read 186
Write 139
Mixed 116
SusWrite 136
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 18.2
67% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 29.5
22% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.27% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback