Asus X542UN

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X542UN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X542UN
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '19 at 13:47
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 145 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 255 35% 261 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0 29,453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 1B10) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9835 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 13 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 7.03 11% 10.4 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 18.5 13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 56GB free Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 125 122 127 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 364 Write 128 Mixed 155 SusWrite 119 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 11 66% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 117 115% 188 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 776GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 78 72 91 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 55.7 Write 30.9 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 73.5 42% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 131% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X542UN Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X542UN

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	205x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	167x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	242x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	132x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	34x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	123x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	42x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GBHynixBench 50%, 4,021 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16