Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 14:51
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 301
44% 321 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 7.47
6% 8.86 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 16.5
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 61
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 64
50% 67.2 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 67.3
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,296
Write 1,096
Mixed 435
208% 942 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 36.3
165% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 382
369% 598 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 102 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 64.2
Write 127
Mixed 86
SusWrite 108
72% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback