To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom D510-$204
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.51% Terrible
1-Core 7
2-Core 13.5
5% 10.2 Pts
4-Core 19.9
8-Core 25.5
3% 22.7 Pts
64-Core 26.5
2% 26.5 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$35
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 64 58 64 59 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 66.5
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 59.1
37% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
7.48% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.77 GB/s
Latency 312
13% 312 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 6,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $56
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback