Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12L

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12L (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120924
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 112 56% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 177 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 5.28 5% 5.78 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.73 Splatting 5.52 4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 48 58 67 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30% Below average	Read 365 Write 76.7 Mixed 102 SusWrite 57.9 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 1.5 32% 9.8 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 15.7 26% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 53%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 535GB free Firmware: JEDOA60B SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 93 90 92 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 91 Write 91.7 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 91.3 58% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 16.6 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 5.9 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L875-12L Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12L

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 8,533 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12L

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L875-12L

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)