| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131106 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '19 at 13:17 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
53.8%
Above average
|
53% 87.5 Pts
|
30% 233 Pts
|
18% 284 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 0460) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.4%
Poor
|
20% 26.4 fps
|
25% 29.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 127 118 130 151 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
98% 134 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
40% 99.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 424x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 386x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $334 |