Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '19 at 16:12
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 132 55% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 310 39% 297 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 4.44 4% 4.28 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 7.09 5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB 2,962 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 457 Write 256 Mixed 269 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 27.5 96% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 181 154% 226 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 89%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 21GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 144 144 146 146 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 391 Write 292 Mixed 298 SusWrite 172 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 26.2 80% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 178 184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 633GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31 Write 24.7 Mixed 21.2 31% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT Corsair CMV8GX3M2A1333C9 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT Corsair CMV8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.4% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E900 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	45x
Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	15x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	12x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	41x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16