Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '19 at 23:13
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4 196 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 171 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 719 62% 528 Pts	64-Core 2,076 128% 2,076 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 171 Parallax 186 113% 165 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 182 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 490GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1011 1002 927 878 924 903 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,095 Write 1,264 Mixed 436 SusWrite 941 210% 934 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 37 123% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 487 353% 461 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 302%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 24TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 281% 22TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 803 848 838 826 807 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 103% Great: 401%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 52 7.4 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 147 Write 114 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 22.6 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 112%
Drobo 5D3 70.5TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 62TB free, PID 3533 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 38 39 43 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 40 Write 36.3 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 39.7 54% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 4.3 408% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C14 4x16GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 56.5 MC Write 53.2 MC Mixed 45.4 148% 51.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 139%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,578

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16