PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds) |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181227 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 17 '19 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
462GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 94 94 93 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 442 446 444 417 426 MB/s
|
99.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
10GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 114 115 114 113 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.4%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 4,708x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 4,615x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,781x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,304x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $670Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,127x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,081x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $1,131 |