Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310MS2P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '19 at 12:18
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 224 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 503 68% 505 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 98.5 Reflection 91 Parallax 89.9 80% 93.1 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 86.2 Splatting 76.5 72% 89.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,355 Write 53.7 Mixed 108 451% 2,172 MB/s	4K Read 768 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 6.7 1,174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 466GB free Firmware: CC38 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 120 Write 110 Mixed 66 73% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 10GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 15 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 153 Write 28.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 13.3 52% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.7 138% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x8GB 1,102 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.7% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 22.9 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 22.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2P Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2P

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	107x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	68x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16