Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '19 at 13:35
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 554 57% 458 Pts	64-Core 553 34% 553 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 42.3 Parallax 56.3 37% 48.2 fps	MRender 57 Gravity 53.1 Splatting 39.3 40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD240HAFV-000DA 240GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM02W1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 159 160 144 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 466 Write 332 Mixed 256 SusWrite 129 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40.6 157% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 143 153% 258 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 96%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 235GB free Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 323 329 331 329 321 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 966 Write 821 Mixed 837 SusWrite 383 168% 752 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 66.1 231% 89.9 MB/s	DQ Read 742 DQ Write 886 DQ Mixed 625 524% 751 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 193%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 157GB free Firmware: JKAOA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 67 63 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 101 Write 85.2 Mixed 54 SusWrite 66.2 56% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 224GB free Firmware: JKAOA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 82 84 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 92.4 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 85.3 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 350GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 82 76 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 77.3 Write 75.8 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 79.7 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 69%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 22GB free, PID 1000, Transcend JetFlash 600 32Gb Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.66% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 11.6 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 19.6 18% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 58%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free, PID a838, Lexar JumpDrive S75 128GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 73 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 110 Write 20.3 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 73 85% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4GB free, PID 0259, Verbatim 32GB Store 'n' Go Secure Pro USB 3.0 Flash Drive 98665 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 8.2 12 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 85.9 Write 52.7 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 11.1 46% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 2.1 103% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-400.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.1% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	132x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16