Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '19 at 18:58
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 249 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 946 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,368 85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 310 307 307 308 308 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1,979 Write 1425 Mixed 554 SusWrite 482 245% 1,110 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 55.5 202% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,070 DQ Write 1,004 DQ Mixed 623 581% 899 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 312 313 316 315 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 469 Mixed 398 SusWrite 330 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 52.7 174% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 534GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,584 Write 6,856 Mixed 7,228 1,613% 7,222 MB/s	4K Read 456 4K Write 257 4K Mixed 295 1,206% 336 MB/s	DQ Read 1321 DQ Write 934 DQ Mixed 949 757% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Intel X25-M 120GB 1,606 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 112GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 110 113 108 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 253 Write 114 Mixed 140 SusWrite 110 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 11.3 77% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 79.8 71% 107 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 46%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 55GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 102 105 109 105 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 250 Write 109 Mixed 142 SusWrite 106 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 11.4 74% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 88.2 77% 116 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 308GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 108 108 109 94 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 106 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 25GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 102 105 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 76.1 Write 74.9 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 101 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 75%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 288GB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 157 158 162 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 147 Write 148 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 156 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 235% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 271GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 95 94 94 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 106 Write 61.8 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 92.6 105% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 45%
Sony Micro Vault Mach USB 3.0 16GB-$42 306 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free, PID 05b9 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 11 9.6 11 9.6 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 168 Write 11.3 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 10 43% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 42%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 16GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 34 23 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 25 Mixed 5 SusWrite 29.6 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 49 MC Write 48.1 MC Mixed 43.3 134% 46.8 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 43.2 SC Mixed 35 101% 35.3 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)