Fujitsu LifeBook T5010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LifeBook T5010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB1EA
Memory1.7 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090421
Uptime55.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 28
2-Core 61.1
32% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 61.5
8% 63.2 Pts
64-Core 64.7
4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Fujitsu(10CF 1458) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.49 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 32 15 9.3 20 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 64.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 20.9
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback