Biostar TZ77A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TZ77A  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 19:50
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 286
42% 307 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 39.5
33% 37.2 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 37.4
32% 39 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 300 240 218 211 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 382
Write 335
Mixed 303
SusWrite 254
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 37.5
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 55.4
48% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
339GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 145 162 162 162 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 174
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 156
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 107%
SABRENT 1TB
363GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 26
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ77A Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77A - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $659
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback