soyo SY-H55+ 3E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboardsoyo SY-H55+ 3E  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100813
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 92.9
44% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 94.6
8-Core 120
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 16.3
14% 15.8 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 18
Splatting 16.1
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 67 67 66 82 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 91
Write 91
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 69.2
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback